personal-finance

Divorce and Social Security: Enforcing Alimony Against a Wealthy Ex

Summarized from MarketWatch.com - Top Stories

A woman receiving $1,460 monthly in Social Security faces financial hardship while her millionaire ex-husband refuses to pay court-ordered alimony.

Few financial situations feel as legally complex — or as emotionally draining — as trying to enforce a divorce settlement against a resistant, wealthy former spouse. That is precisely the predicament facing one woman who collects $1,460 a month in Social Security benefits while her 74-year-old ex-husband, whose financial statements reportedly show assets in the millions, refuses to meet his alimony obligations. The income gap between the two is stark, and it raises urgent questions about the practical tools available to lower-income divorced spouses.

Alimony enforcement is ultimately a matter of family court jurisdiction, and courts have meaningful levers to pull. Judges can hold a non-paying ex-spouse in contempt, order wage garnishments, place liens on property, or in some jurisdictions even pursue incarceration for willful non-compliance. The fact that the ex-husband is 74 and apparently asset-rich rather than income-rich complicates some of these mechanisms — garnishing investment accounts or real estate holdings requires additional legal steps compared with garnishing a paycheck — but it does not make enforcement impossible.

Read more Opportunity Zone Tax Deferral Ends Dec. 31 for High Earners →

For divorced women in particular, the financial stakes of alimony disputes are outsized. Social Security alone rarely covers basic living costs, especially for older recipients who left the workforce for extended periods during a marriage. The $1,460 monthly figure cited here is close to the average Social Security retirement benefit, illustrating how thin that safety net truly is when it stands as someone's primary income source. A family law attorney with experience in high-net-worth divorces would be the critical first call, as they can assess whether the original divorce decree offers strong enough language to pursue enforcement efficiently.

Beyond legal remedies, divorced spouses who were married for at least 10 years may be entitled to claim Social Security benefits based on their ex-spouse's earnings record — potentially increasing monthly income without any cooperation from the ex-husband. This benefit does not reduce what the ex-spouse collects, making it a politically straightforward option that many divorced women overlook. Financial advisers who specialize in gray divorce — separations involving people over 50 — are increasingly attuned to these layered strategies combining legal enforcement with Social Security optimization.

The broader lesson is that a millionaire's balance sheet and a courtroom order together do not automatically produce financial security for the lower-earning ex-spouse. Persistence through the legal system, combined with a thorough audit of all available income sources, remains the most reliable path forward. Continue reading at MarketWatch.com

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.What can a divorced spouse do if an ex-husband refuses to pay court-ordered alimony?

Family courts can hold a non-paying spouse in contempt, garnish wages or accounts, and place liens on property. Consulting a family law attorney experienced in high-net-worth cases is the recommended first step.

Q.Can a divorced woman collect Social Security benefits based on her ex-husband's record?

Yes. Divorced spouses who were married for at least 10 years may be eligible to claim Social Security benefits based on their ex-spouse's earnings history, and doing so does not reduce the ex-spouse's own benefit.

Q.How much is the woman in this situation receiving from Social Security each month?

She receives $1,460 per month in Social Security benefits, which serves as her primary source of income while her ex-husband reportedly holds assets in the millions.

More in personal finance →