Wedbush's Dan Ives Calls $3T Tech Selloff a Buying Opportunity
Dan Ives argues Big Tech is deeply oversold after a $3 trillion market-cap wipeout driven by AI spending skepticism.
As nearly $3 trillion in Big Tech market value evaporated in June, Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives walked onto CNBC with a contrarian argument: the market is misreading the situation entirely. The selloff, driven largely by growing investor skepticism over artificial intelligence capital expenditures, has pushed some of the sector's most consequential names into territory Ives considers unjustifiably cheap. His message was blunt — these stocks are way oversold.
Ives, who serves as Wedbush's Global Head of Technology Research, singled out Microsoft as among the names he believes the market has punished too harshly. His underlying thesis is that the pessimism surrounding AI infrastructure spending conflates short-term cost concerns with what he sees as a long-term structural transformation. In his framing, the capex skeptics are focusing on the invoice without reading the revenue potential attached to it.
Read more S&P 500 Sector Forecast: Tech Fades, Utilities and Industrials Rise →
The analytical tension here is meaningful. A growing cohort of Wall Street observers has questioned whether the scale of AI investment by hyperscalers will generate returns commensurate with the spending. That uncertainty has real weight — cloud and AI buildout costs are enormous and their monetization timelines remain contested. Ives, however, represents a camp that views the current correction as a sentiment-driven overshoot rather than a rational repricing of fundamentals.
For retail and institutional investors alike, the Ives call is a reminder that major tech dislocations historically produce both genuine value and painful value traps. Whether this selloff resolves as a buying window or a warning sign depends heavily on whether enterprise AI adoption accelerates at the pace bulls are projecting. The next several quarters of earnings from Microsoft and its peers will serve as the real verdict on that debate.
Continue reading at Yahoo.
